Other information. ” Bellevue John Does 1-11 v. Bellevue Sch. Dist. (2008). 1B. Information that could be protected includes health information, marital status, disability, and reasonable accommodations. King County v. Sheehan (2002).
“Shot issues, rating important factors, or any other test investigation always provide a license, a position, or instructional test” was excused as the revelation will give an unnecessary benefit to applicants getting licenses or work.
Labels off people in addition to their work applications and you can accompanying materials is actually exempt. Discover Beltran v. Dep’t Social Wellness Qualities (1999).
City of Spokane (1993)
If a candidate is leased, certain firms do not think of this exemption to make use of to that applicant’s suggestions. Rather, the fresh new providers move to exemptions such RCW (3) and you will RCW (3) to determine whether or not to redact information that is personal from the information.
In addition, the suggestions amassed while in the testing of the employers into the unfair labor strategies otherwise a job discrimination says are specially stated are excused whenever you are the individuals research are in procedure
To have societal personnel, volunteers, and you can individual household health care specialists, that it section exempts their property address contact information and you will cell phone numbers, personal cell phone numbers and you may emails, public cover and you will driver’s certificates or county identicard number, and you may disaster contact info. Because of their dependents, equivalent info is exempt apart from times off birth was extra due to the fact exempt and license and you will identicard quantity aren’t listed due to the fact excused. To possess staff out of violent fairness businesses, its photos and you can day and seasons out of birth also are exempt, except if questioned from the news media. This section is intended to manage such personnel on the offender inhabitants, just like the shown by the exception in the definition of news media of people held inside the custody of these companies.
The newest law brings that this exemption pertains to pointers stored inside the teams and you may a position-related suggestions. Although not, private email addresses from area councilmembers familiar with perform town providers was indeed located not to ever become excused, as they were not part of personnel details or a job-relevant facts. Mechling v. City of Monroe (2009).
Identification regarding professionals seeking to advice to determine its rights in the you can easily says out-of discrimination facing him or her try excused whenever professionals query one its labels be withheld; zero demonstrating off a danger of damage becomes necessary as is you’ll need for unlawful evaluation. RCW (4). RCW (5).
The PRA exempts “cleverness pointers” and you may “specific investigative facts” published by investigative, law enforcement, penology, and you may top-notch disciplinary agencies in the event the information is “important to active the authorities” or necessary to protect another person’s confidentiality rights. “Particular . . . investigative ideas” are definitely the results of an investigation 
“Investigative, the police, and penology enterprises” try agencies with expert to research and you can punish, for instance the cops, the police interior items investigation unit, individuals Revelation Payment, medical disciplinary forums, otherwise a district wellness agency. A keen investigative institution can get excused solely those records manufactured in the investigative function. Columbian Posting v. Town of Vancouver (1983) (a standard query towards the institution employees things is not a keen “investigation” once the contemplated from the PRA, though it’s did legally enforcement officers).