8 Petrarch’s source is Pliny, Historia naturalia, tr. W.H.S. Jones (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963), Book 29, 1-8; Petrarch makes https://datingranking.net/it/mingle2-review/ repeated use of Pliny, see especially, the Invective, henceforth cited as ICM, I, 828; II, 868, 872; III, 912.
9 The classification of medicine as per mechanical art can be found mediante Hugh of St. 11; Petrarch refers to medicine as per mechanical art also mediante XII, 2, 454, 466, 473-4.
10 Fracassetti, Lettere senile, vol. 2, 242-3, translates per passage not found mediante Bernardo’s edition: “Vedi volubilita di professione, forse e inutilita della cura,” XII, 2.
The continuing popularity of the Conciliator is attested by per seventeenth-century epitome, Conciliator enucleatus seu differentiarum philosophicarum et medicarum petri apponensis Compendium, Gregori Lorsti, acad
11 Peirce, “How esatto Make Our Ideas Clear,” Writings, vol. 3, 263-4: “The bath of per belief is the establishment of a habit, and different beliefs are distinguished by the different modes of action sicuro which they give rise.”
V. Nutton remarks that per good manuscript of Galen’s works was available at the papal court mediante 1353, John Caius and the Manuscripts of Galen, (Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society, 1987), vol
12 On Petrarch and the dialecticians see Pietro Paolo Gerosa, Umanesimo umano del Petrarca; Prestigio agostiniana, attinenze medievali (Turin: Credenza d’Erasmo, 1966), 208f. 13. Petrarch seems sicuro collapse dialectic and logic; on this issue see Eleonore Stump, Dialectic and its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989).
14 Petrarch is not above employing syllogizing, con deepest irony, of course; see ICM, III, 932: “Certe ego nunc risu et verecundia impedior sillogismum tibi tuo parem mittere, quo probem te vilissime servum rei. Quod urbanius possum dicam: si quod alio spectat, et ad aliud refertur, et propter aliud levante inventum, illi serviat oportet, ut dissimule vis. Antidoto autem tua pecumian spectat et ad illam refertur et propter illam levante. Conclude, dyaletice: pertanto pecunie intrigante est.”
15 Petrarch also argues that the more necessary is not by that more noble: “Igitur putas necessitas artium nobilitatem arguat. Contra levante; alioquin nobilissimus artificum erit agricola; sutor quoque et pistor et cache, sinon mactare desieris, mediante precio eritis,” ICM, III, 894-6; cf. III, 910.
16 “. . . the doctor had done nothing at all, nor could he have except what verso loquacious dialectician, rich durante boredom and lacking in remedies, can do”; “Medicum nil omnino vel fecisse, vel facere potuisse, nisi quod dialecticus loquax potest, taedii dives, inopsque remedii.”
18 I use the edition, Conciliator controversarium quae inter philosophos eet medicos versantur (Venice: apud Juntas, 1548). Nancy Siraisi’s conversation of d’Abano per Arts and Sciences at Padua; The Studium of Padua before 1350 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1973), is excellent. D’Abano notes the attack on him as Averroist by the Dominicans con Differentia 48; Nardi contests the notion of d’Abano as Averroist sopra “La credenza dell’anima anche la eta delle forme posteriore Pietro d’Abano,” 1-17, and “Da ogni parte alle dottrine filosofiche di Pietro d’Abano,” durante Studi sulla preparazione aristotelica nel Veneto, I: Saggi sull’Aristotelismo padovano dal mondo XIV at XVI (Florence: Sansoni, 1958), 19-74. P. Ovverosia. Kristeller makes the point that Petrarch’s opponents sopra the De sui ipsius et multorum ignorantia were probably Bolognese, not Paduans, per “Petrarch’s ‘Averroists’; Per Note on the History of Aristotelianism per Venice, Padua, and Bologna,” Bibliotheque d’Humanisme et Renaissance, 14 (1952), 59-65. Giessena (Giessae: Casparus Chemlinus, 1621).
19 Lynn Thorndike, “Translations from the Greek by Pietro d’Abano,” Isis, 33 (1942), 649-53; see also V. Nutton, “Galen on Prognosis,” Campione medicorum graecorum, 8.1.1 (1979), 27.
21 See the argument cited mediante Differentia 3, (8r): “. . . medicari non oriente scientia accidentelle: sed quidam actus et labor particularis, et de tali assenza est scientia . . . regulat in actu operandi particularem et tunc consequitor medicinae finis perfecte, quod ostenditur.”