Statistical analyses of very first characteristics of investigation

Statistical analyses of very first characteristics of investigation

The analyses work at five variety of time collection for every of your own 31 businesses placed in the DJIA from inside the several months of your study: the latest daily level of states from an excellent organization’s title on Financial Minutes, the fresh each and every day deal level of an excellent organizations stock, the brand new day-after-day natural go back of a beneficial organization’s stock therefore the daily go back regarding an excellent organizations stock. Ahead of running correlational analyses, i look for stationarity and normality of every of them 124 go out series.

To check for stationarity, we first run an Lethbridge hotel hookup Augmented Dickey-Fuller test on each of these company name mention, daily transaction volume, daily absolute return and daily return time series. With the exception of the time series of mentions of Coca-Cola in the Financial Times, we reject the null hypothesis of a unit root for all time series, providing support for the assumption of stationarity of these time series (company names mentions: Coca-Cola Dickey-Fuller = ?3.137, p = 0.099; all other Dickey-Fuller < ?3.478, all other ps < 0.05; daily transaction volume: all Dickey-Fuller < ?3.763, all ps < 0.05; daily absolute return: all Dickey-Fuller < ?5.046, all ps < 0.01; daily return: all Dickey-Fuller < ?9.371, all ps < 0.01). We verify the results of the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test with an alternative test for the presence of a unit root, the Phillips-Perron test. Here, we reject the null hypothesis of a unit root for all company name, transaction volume, absolute return and return time series, with no exceptions, again providing support for the assumption of stationarity of these time series (company names mentions: all Dickey-Fuller Z(?) < ?, all ps < 0.01; daily transaction volume: all Dickey-Fuller Z(?) < ?, all ps < 0.01; daily absolute return: all Dickey-Fuller Z(?) < ?, all ps < 0.01; daily return: all Dickey-Fuller Z(?) < ?, all ps < 0.01).

To check for normality, we run a Shapiro-Wilk test on each of our company name mention, daily transaction volume, daily absolute return and daily return time series. We find that none of our 124 time series have a Gaussian distribution (company names mentions: all W < 0.945, all ps < 0.01; daily transaction volume: all W < 0.909, all ps < 0.01; daily absolute return: all W < 0.811, all ps < 0.01; daily return: all W < 0.962, all ps < 0.01).

Records

Preis, T., Schneider, J. J. Stanley, H. Elizabeth. Switching processes from inside the economic places. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A good. 108, 7674–7678 (2011).

On study, we ergo test with the existence away from dating between datasets from the figuring Spearman’s rank relationship coefficient, a non-parametric scale that makes no presumption in regards to the normality of underlying research

Podobnik, B., Horvatic, D., Petersen, An excellent. Meters. Stanley, H. Elizabeth. Cross-correlations anywhere between frequency changes and you will rate transform. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.Good. 106, 22079–22084 (2009).

Feng, L., Li, B., Podobnik, B., Preis, T. Stanley, H. Age. Hooking up representative-oriented habits and you may stochastic varieties of economic avenues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A beneficial. 109, 8388–8393 (2012).

Preis, T., Kenett, D. Y. Stanley, H. Age. Helbing, D. Ben-Jacob, Age. Quantifying the conclusion out-of inventory correlations lower than ).

Krawiecki, An effective., Holyst, J. A beneficial. Helbing, D. Volatility clustering and you can scaling to own financial time show because of attractor bubbling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 158701 (2002).

Watanabe, K., Takayasu, H. Takayasu, M. A statistical concept of new economic bubbles and accidents. Physica A great 383, 120–124 (2007).

Preis, T., Moat, H. S., Bishop, S. Roentgen., Treleaven, P. Stanley, H. Elizabeth. Quantifying the latest Digital Traces out of Hurricane Exotic into the Flickr. Sci. Rep. step three, 3141 (2013).

Moat, H. S., Preis, T., Olivola, C. Y., Liu, C. Chater, N. Having fun with huge research in order to assume collective behavior about real life. Behav. Notice Sci. (inside the push).