Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale (ICDS). (Hamamci Buyukozturk, 2004). The second subscale, Unrealistic Relationship Expectation, consisting eight items implies that individuals had high expectations in their relationships concerning both their own behaviors and the behaviors of others. The third subscale, Interpersonal Misperception, comprised three items. This subscale is based on the belief that individuals can predict the thoughts and emotions of the others without overt communication. 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (I strongly disagree) to 5 (I strongly agree) was used. Scores were ranged from 0 to 151. Higher score indicated greater adherence to dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient was .67 for total scale 73, for the first subscale, .66 for the second subscale and .43 for the third subscale. The correlation coefficients measured for randomly split sample were ranged from .56 to .73 for three subscales. Test-retest coefficient in 15 days was .74. Convergent validity was evident in the positive correlations among the ICDS subscales and the Turkish versions of Automatic Thoughts Scale (r = .54, p<.001 ) and Irrational Belief Scale (r = .54, p<.001). Construct validity was evident in the positive correlation with the Conflict Tendency Scale (r = -.53 p<.001). The bivariate correlations between the different factors of the ICDS ranged between .07 and. 15.
Disagreement Quality Level (CRS) (Akbalik, 2001).This scale was created to gauge the behaviors incompatible solution procedure of later adolescents. There are 55 activities in four subscales and information most other individuals, paying attention experiences, targeting others’ needs, societal adaption and you may anger administration. The size was used a good 5-point Likert-types of scale, between 1 = totally not true from me to cuatro = primarily genuine away from myself. In the measure, 34 points have been scored definitely and you can 21 activities was indeed scored inversely. CRS score was basically varied off 55 in order to 220 with a high scores exhibiting sophisticated regarding disagreement quality habits. Alpha coefficient out of internal texture of your level are .91 .It viewpoints was indeed .86 into the first subscale, .82 to your next subscale, .75 on 3rd subscale, .78 to the fourth subscale and .80 this new fifth subscale.
The original subscale, Interpersonal Getting rejected which have 7 situations integrated facts regarding negative attribution of anyone on the people’ practices and you will qualities and you can viewpoints related to are really close to other people inside their relationship explanations bad outcomes
Parents Teenage Dating Measure (Kaner, 2000). It scale was used to assess separately father or mother-adolescent connections regarding adolescents’ effect. From the size, there had been seven subscales (romantic interaction, of social hobby together, sensitiveness, like and faith, overseeing, providers norm, rewarding standards) both for mom means (MRS) and father means (FRS), however in dad function you will find yet another subscale also house laws and regulations. Mommy function was developed upwards from 30 circumstances beneath the seven subscales. Father function is made from 37 points underneath the eigth subscales. The scale was applied 5-point-measure (5 = never, step 1 = always). Ranges acquiring of mom’s means is from one so you can 150. Dad form are varied from just one in order to 185. High score mean adolescents’ bad thinking of the connections that have mothers. Accuracy of the types of mom and dad have been over on their own. Cronbach leader coefficient out-of inner feel is .ninety five mommy form and you may. 93 to have father form. Correlation coefficients determined towards the very first and you will 2nd halves of one’s sample was in fact .83 for mother form. Split-half coefficient was receive because the .82 for father form.
The size and style contains around three subscales having 19 affairs; Interpersonal Rejection, Unlikely Relationships Assumption and you will Social Misperception
Forms was in fact administered in order to ready pupils during their kinds anywhere between and you can these were finished in one to class. They took nearly one hour to make use of devices. In advance of management, the kind of one’s data are told me, questionnaires is demonstrated to help you players and consent regarding contribution is actually obtained last but not least they certainly were told about how they’d to address circumstances on the surveys. Recommendations were given one another vocally https://datingranking.net/nl/luvfree-overzicht/ and you may authored. Members was together with advised that a summary of the newest conclusions you certainly will be given in order to professionals who want knowing the outcomes.